To prove a cause of action under section 2C:41-2(c) of the New Jersey Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“New Jersey RICO”), N.J.S.A. § 2C:41-2(c), the plaintiff must demonstrate (1) the existence of an enterprise, (2) that the enterprise engaged in or its activities affected trade or commerce, (3) that defendant was employed by, or associated with the enterprise, (4) that he participated in the conduct of the affairs of the enterprise, and (5) that he participated through a pattern of racketeering activity.  State v. Ball, 141 N.J. 142, 181-187, 661 A.2d 251, 270-274 (N.J. 1995).  New Jersey RICO defines “racketeering activity” as including, among other things, bribery, extortion, forgery and fraudulent practices, securities fraud, and all crimes set forth in chapter 21 of Title 2C of the New Jersey Statutes.  See N.J.S.A. § 2C:41-1(a).

In order to demonstrate a pattern of racketeering activity under New Jersey RICO, the plaintiff must show (1) that the defendant committed at least two predicate acts and (2) that the incidents of racketeering activity embrace criminal conduct that has either the same or similar purposes, results, participants or victims or methods of commission or are otherwise interrelated by distinguishing characteristics and are not isolated incidents.  See Ball, 141 N.J. at 184-185, 661 A.2d at 272-273.

A person who proves a claim under section 2C:41-2 of New Jersey RICO is entitled to recover threefold the damages sustained by him, and reasonable attorneys’ fees.  N.J.S.A. § 2C:41-4(c).

“The language of the New Jersey counterpart of [the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”)], 18 U.S.C. § 1962, N.J.S.A. 2C:41-2, is identical in all material respects except that the New Jersey Act is directed toward enterprises engaged in or the activities of which affect ‘trade or commerce,’ not interstate or foreign commerce.”  Kievit v. Rokeach, No. 86-2592, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16131, at *20-*21 (D.N.J. Oct. 29, 1987); accord New Jersey Office Supply, Inc. v. Feldman, No. 89-3990, 1990 WL 74477, at *3 (D.N.J. June 4, 1990).

“The virtual identity of the Federal and New Jersey RICO acts permits the Court to interpret them in a consistent manner.”  Kievit, No. 86-2592, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16131, at *20-*21; accord Gilmore v. Berg, 761 F. Supp. 358, 375 (D.N.J. 1991).

That is, at least where “[t]here is no state decisional law on . . . [an] aspect of civil [New Jersey] RICO law,” “parallel federal case law is an appropriate reference source to interpret the [New Jersey] RICO statute.”  Interchange State Bank v. Veglia, 286 N.J. Super. 164, 177, 668 A.2d 465, 472 (App. Div. 1995), cert. denied, 144 N.J. 377, 676 A.2d 1092 (N.J. 1996); accord Cetel v. Kirwan Fin. Group, Inc., 460 F.3d 494, 510 (3d Cir.2006).

If your company wants to bring, or needs a lawyer to defend it in, business litigation and you are located in the New York City area, call Attorney David S. Rich at (212) 209-3972.

On December 29, 2014, New York State Governor Andrew Cuomo signed into law Assembly Bill 8106-C / Senate Bill 5885-B (the "Act"). Among other changes to current law, the Act renders the ten members with the largest percentage ownership interest of each limited liability company ("LLC") in New York State personally liable, jointly and severally, [...]

What Are The Elements Of Fraud In New Jersey?

In New Jersey, the elements of common-law fraud are: "(1) a material misrepresentation of a presently existing or past fact; (2) knowledge or belief by the defendant of its falsity; (3) an intention that the other person rely on it; (4) reasonable reliance thereon by the other person; and (5) resulting damages." Gennari v. Weichert [...]

In September 2014, the respective Mayors of four municipalities in New Jersey -- the Cities of East Orange, Passaic, and Paterson and the Township of Irvington -- signed into law paid sick leave ordinances for private employees (collectively, the "Sick Leave Ordinances" or the "Ordinances"). Effective January 2015, the East Orange, Irvington, Passaic, and Paterson [...]

In New York, "In order to establish a breach of fiduciary duty, a plaintiff must prove the existence of a fiduciary relationship, misconduct by the defendant, and damages that were directly caused by the defendant's misconduct." Kurtzman v. Bergstol, 40 A.D.3d 588, 590, 835 N.Y.S.2d 644 (2nd Dep't 2007); see also Pokoik v. Pokoik, 982 [...]

On September 30, 2014, New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio signed an executive order,Executive Order No. 7 (the “Executive Order”), requiring companies or individuals who receive, from the City of New York or from a City economic development entity, financial assistance of one million dollars or more and which have annual gross revenues of [...]

In New Jersey, common law conversion is defined as ” ‘the exercise of any act of dominion in denial of another’s title to . . . chattels, or inconsistent with such title. ‘ ”  Marsellis-Warner Corp. v. Rabens, 51 F. Supp. 2d 508, 525 (D.N.J. 1999) (quoting Mueller v. Technical Devices Corp., 8 N.J. 201, [...]

On August 11, 2014, New Jersey Governor Chris Christie signed into law the New Jersey Opportunity to Compete Act, Pub. L. 2014, ch. 32 (the “Opportunity to Compete Act,” the “NJOCPA,” or the “Act”), which takes effect on March 1, 2015.  The Opportunity to Compete Act prohibits employers in New Jersey from requiring applicants for [...]

In New York, the elements of conversion are “(1) intent, (2) interference ‘to the exclusion of the owner’s rights,’ and (3) possession, or the right to possession in plaintiff.”   2 Leon C. Lazer, et al., New York Pattern Jury Instructions – Civil § 3.1 (2d ed. 2006) (quotingEmployers’ Fire Ins. Co. v. Cotten, 245 N.Y. 102, 156 N.E. [...]

On July 7, 2014, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo signed into law the New York Compassionate Care Act, N.Y. State Senate Bill S07923, N.Y. State Assembly Bill A06357E(the “NYCCA” or the “Act”), which, effective immediately, legalizes and comprehensively regulates the manufacture, sale and use of medical marijuana in New York State. The New York State Assembly had [...]

In New York, within every contract is an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing.  The covenant is breached when a party acts in a manner that deprives the other party of the right to receive benefits under their agreement.  The covenant encompasses any promises which a reasonable person in the position of the promisee would [...]